User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.101 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-026.php
Chrome 30.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose1.64284 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.10899 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.101WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51095 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.101closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:51 | by ThaDafinser