User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru; Impress_L Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/9.5.1.494 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.5Android 4.2unknown VertexImpress LMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.2VertexImpress LMobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30997 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 4.2.2Impress_Lcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.14898 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.494WebKit 528.5Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 528.5Android 4.2.2Impress_Lmobile:smartyescloseclose0.09201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:51 | by ThaDafinser