User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;Samsung;SmartTV2013;T-MST12DEUC-1102.1;;) WebKit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSmartTV2013 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.17798 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSmart TV 2013tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSamsung 2013.0SamsungSmartTV2013closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SamsungSmart TV 2013televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:50 | by ThaDafinser