User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; IQ4490) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.0.332 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 8.8Android 4.1unknown FlyERA Nano 4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.1FlyERA Nano 4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxA61mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25597 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.024 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.0.332 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41996 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.1.2FlyIQ449 Prontomobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:50 | by ThaDafinser