User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux; de) KHTML/3.5.8 (like Gecko) (Debian)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Konqueror 3.5Debian KHTML desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.086 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 3.5KHTML Debian desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 3.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 3.5closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40196 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 3.5KHTML 3.5.8Debian desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:50 | by ThaDafinser