User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/7E18 Grindr/1.8.5 (iPod2,1/4.2.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPod2,1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.089 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 528.18closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS AppleiPod Touch 2Gportable media playeryes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPod2,1closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.10599 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 528.18iOS AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 528.18iOS AppleiPod touch (2nd gen)mediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:49 | by ThaDafinser