User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; xx; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20051012 Netscape/8.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-netscape.yaml
Netscape 8.0.4Windows XPGecko 1.7.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 8.0Gecko WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.095 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 8.0.4closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Netscape Navigator 8.0.4closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 8.0.4closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Netscape 8.0.4closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 8.0.4Gecko 20051012Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape 8.0.4Gecko 1.7.5Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:48 | by ThaDafinser