User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.6; A95 Build/CelkonCelkon_A95) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.40 Mobile Safari/537.31 OPR/14.0.1074.54070
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CelkonA95 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1074.54070closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 14.0.1074.54070closeAndroid 2.3.6CelkonA95mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29897 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 14.0Presto Android 2.3CelkonSGP311smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1074.54070closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 14.0.1074closeAndroid 2.3.6CelkonA95closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.04999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 14.0.1074.54070WebKit 537.31Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 14.0Webkit 537.31Android 2.3.6A95mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1074.54070closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 14closeAndroid 2.3CelkonA95Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.087 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:48 | by ThaDafinser