User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (S60; SymbOS; Opera Mobi/275; U; es-ES) Presto/2.4.13 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Symbian OS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeSymbian OS OperaOpera for Series 60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto Symbian OS Series 60 yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00closeSymbOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.0closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeSymbOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.13Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.13Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 12.00close OperaOpera for Series 60Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:48 | by ThaDafinser