User agent detail

MOT-CN620/01.00.00R Mozilla/4.5 (Windows; U) NetFront/3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaCN620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-CN620 01.00.00Rcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.1closeWindows MotorolaCN620mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.1NetFront Windows MotorolaCN620smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.1closeWindows MotorolaCN620closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50095 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.1 Windows MotorolaCN620mobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.1close MotorolaCN620Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser