User agent detail

HTC MAX 4G Opera/9.5 (Microsoft Windows; PPC; Opera Mobi/1409; U; ru)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows HTCMax 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.5Presto Windows HTCMAX 4Gsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.5closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows HTCMAX 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14499 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41096 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.5 Windows Mobile HTCMAX 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close HTCMax 4GFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser