User agent detail

Dalvik/1.4.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; HTC HD7 4G T9299 For AT&T Build/GRJ22)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCHD7 4G T9299 For AT&T Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.4WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCHD7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24698 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCHD7 4G T9299 For AT&Tsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCHD7 4G T9299 For AT&Tcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 2.3.5HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.5HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser