User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110622 HeartRails_Capture/1.0.5 (+http://capture.heartrails.com/) Namoroka/3.6.18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesHeartRails Capture Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.18closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19498 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Namoroka (3.6Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox (Namoroka) 3.6.18closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Namoroka 3.6.18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.18Gecko 20110622Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40996 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesHeartRails Captureclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser