User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; kau; samsung-c6625) UCBrowser8.4.0.159/69/444/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0, UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungc6625 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.4 Samsungc6625smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.0close Samsungc6625closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.4.0.159 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.4Gecko Windows Mobile SamsungC6625 Valenciamobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser