User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; NokiaX2-05/08.60; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.3.0.0.48
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-s40.yaml
Nokia Xpress 2.3.0Series40 Gecko NokiaX2-05mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.3Gecko SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.075 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.33497 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.3Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 NokiaX2-05smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 08.60;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.3.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaX2-05closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.3.0.0.48Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia X2-05closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.3.0Gecko Series40 NokiaX2-05mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 5.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaX2-05Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser