User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 3607.0.2013) AppleWebKit/537.27 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1393.2 Safari/537.27
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome Dev 26.0.1393.2Chrome OS Webkit 537.27desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit Chrome OS 3607.0desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS 26.0.1393.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1393closeChrome OS 3607.0.2013closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS 3607.0.2013closecloseclosecloseclose0.08599 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1393.2WebKit 537.27ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47195 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1393.2Webkit 537.27Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:47 | by ThaDafinser