User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; xx; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120128 NokiaN95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 Gecko 1.9.2NokiaN95mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.2.26closeOS X 10.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.18098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Gecko Mac 10.7NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 95closeMac OS X 10.7NokiaN95closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.26closeOS X 10.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.08999 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Gecko 20120128NokiaOS 10.7NokiaNokia N95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40896 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.2Series60 NokiaN95mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:46 | by ThaDafinser