User agent detail

SIE-A31a/03 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.1.0.7.3.102 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensA31a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 SiemensA31AMobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-A31a 03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.7.3.102close SiemensA31amobile-browseryescloseclose0.18998 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 SiemensA31asmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.1.0close SiemensA31acloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.7.3.102 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40196 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.1 SiemensA31mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SiemensA31aFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:45 | by ThaDafinser