User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3xv/85.83.E1P MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaRAZRV3xv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaRAZRV3xvMobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-RAZRV3xv 85.83.E1Pcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaRAZRV3xvmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18898 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaRAZRV3xvsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaRAZRV3xvcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06199 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40996 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaRAZRV3xvmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xvFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:45 | by ThaDafinser