User agent detail

Pulp/1.5.2 (iPad; http://www.acrylicapps.com/pulp/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feed_reader.yml
Pulp 1.5.2iOS AppleiPadtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Pulp 1.5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18098 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pulp 1.5 iOS AppleiPadtabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeiPadcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView close AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iOS AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iOS AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:44 | by ThaDafinser