User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-I9158_TD/1.0 Android/4.2.2 Release/04.03.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9158 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-I9158 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Mega 5.8mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29097 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Mega 5.8phabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9158closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40396 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 535.19Android 4.2.2SamsungGalaxy Mega 5.8mobile:smartyescloseclose0.037 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2SamsungGT-I9158Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.085 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:44 | by ThaDafinser