User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 3.2; en-US; SHW-M305W Build/P2FHU4) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSHW-M305W Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome WebKit Android 3.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 3.2SamsungSHV-M305Wmobile-browseryescloseclose0.36496 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 3.2SamsungSHW-M305Wsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 3.2SamsungSHW-M305Wcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 3.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 3.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 8.9tabletyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 3.2SamsungSHV-M305WTabletyesyescloseclose0.076 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:43 | by ThaDafinser