User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/532 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A538b Safari/419.3 Midori/0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.4iPhone OS 1.0Webkit 532desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 3.0closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.4WebKit iOS 3.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0closeOS X closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeiOS 3.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.4closeiPhone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.06699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.4WebKit 532iOS AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40596 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.4Webkit 532iPhone OS 1.0desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:43 | by ThaDafinser