User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.7/Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; zh-cn; ZTE-U V880 Build/FRF91) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
QQ Browser 3.7Android 2.2.2WebKit ZTEU V880smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2ZTEV880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25997 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.7WebKit Android 2.2ZTEU V880smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.7closeAndroid 2.2.2ZTEV880closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10299 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.7WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.2ZTE Ucloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40696 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.7Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.2ZTEV880 Blademobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2ZTEV880Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.066 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:43 | by ThaDafinser