User agent detail

magpie-crawler/1.1 (U; Linux amd64; en-GB; +http://www.brandwatch.net)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesmagpie-crawlerBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
magpie-crawler 1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesmagpie-crawler/1.1close0.18798 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesMagpie-CrawlerSocial Media Agent0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesmagpie-crawlerclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesmagpie-crawlerCrawler0.07699 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41296 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:42 | by ThaDafinser