User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-C161/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-C161 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-C161 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close SamsungC161mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungSGH-C161smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close SamsungSGH-C161closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungSGH-C161mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungC161Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:42 | by ThaDafinser