User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; arm; en, Nuvi) AppleWebKit/523.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile Safari/419.3 Qt Qtopia Iris/1.1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-iris.yaml
Iris 1.1.2Qtopia Webkit 523.13GarminNuvigps Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 3.0closeLinux Garmin-AsusNüvifone G60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 3.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.1.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 1.1.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.21602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.1.2WebKit 523.13Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iris 1.1.2Webkit 523.13Qtopia GarminNuvigpscloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0closeLinux Garmin-AsusNuvifone G60Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:42 | by ThaDafinser