User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Microsoft Windows CE 7.10.7720; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; SAMSUNG; OMNIA7)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungOMNIA7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 9.0Trident 5.0Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 7.10.7720desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 9.0Trident Windows CE SamsungOMNIA7smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows CE SamsungOMNIA7closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows CE 7.10closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 9.0Trident 5.0Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Mobile Samsung; OMNIA7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:42 | by ThaDafinser