User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; S60/3.0 NOKIAN75/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; S60/3.0 NOKIAN75/1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN75 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Symbian OS Series 60 3.0NokiaN75smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.0closeSymbian OS NokiaN75closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.0NokiaN75mobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:42 | by ThaDafinser