User agent detail

NOKIA-1682C
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1682C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NOKIA-1682C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia1682 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaN1682Csmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia1682Ccloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia1682 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:41 | by ThaDafinser