User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.111 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 38.0MacOSX 10.10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.111closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.111closeOS X 10.10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.111closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeMac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.111closeOS X 10.10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.111WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.111closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:41 | by ThaDafinser