User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us ; TECNO H5 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.4.1.204/145/33567
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TecnoH5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.4WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.4WebKit Android 4.2Tecno MobileH5smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.1closeAndroid 4.2.2TecnoH5closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.14701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.4.1.204WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.65207 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.4Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2TecnoH5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:41 | by ThaDafinser