User agent detail

'Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; es-es; LG Optimus L3 Build/Ice Jelly Nexus Build
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGOptimus L3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4LG Optimus L3 Build/Ice Jelly Nexusmobile-browseryescloseclose0.40004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0GoogleOne Touch 985smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4LGOptimus L3closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.4LGOptimus L3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.125 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:41 | by ThaDafinser