User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia6600f/05.23; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/2.3.0.0.49
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6600f Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 2.3Gecko SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 2.3Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia6600fsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 05.23;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 2.3.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6600fcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 2.3.0.0.49Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6600fcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 2.3.0Gecko Series40 Nokia6600 foldmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 2.3closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6600 foldFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:41 | by ThaDafinser