User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; samsung c5212) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungc5212 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.137 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 Samsungc5212smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close Samsungc5212closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Samsungc5212mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:40 | by ThaDafinser