User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DG's iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPod Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit iOS 4.2AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.0WebKit iOS 4.2AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.2closeiPhone OS 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.18302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.0.2WebKit 533.17.9iOS 4.2.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.2.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.0.2closeiOS AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:40 | by ThaDafinser