User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; SunOS 5.10 sun4u; X11)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 5.0Solaris 5.10Trident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.0Gecko SunOS Desktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Solaris 5.10desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.0closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.0closeSunOS 5.10closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident SunOS SunUltraSparccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0 Solaris 10desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:39 | by ThaDafinser