User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; SM-T2105 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSM-T2105 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.095 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0" Kidstabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSM-T2105closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.1SamsungSM-T2105Tabletyesyescloseclose0.065 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:39 | by ThaDafinser