User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) RockMelt/0.8.34.841 Chrome/6.0.472.63 Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
RockMelt WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
RockMelt 0.8.34.841closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
RockMelt 0.8WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
RockMelt 0.8.34closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
RockMelt 0.8.34.841closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
RockMelt 0.8.34.841WebKit 534.3Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
RockMelt 0.8Webkit 534.3Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 6.0.472.63closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:39 | by ThaDafinser