User agent detail

vk-vk900/1.1 up.browser/6.2.3.4 (gui) mmp/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4 VK Mobilevk900feature phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
vk-vk900 1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave 6.2.3.4close VK MobileVK900mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 VK Mobilevk900feature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 VK MobileVK900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:39 | by ThaDafinser