User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; GoogleTV 4.0.4; LG Google TV Build/000000) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGoogle TV Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.32303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit Google TV 4.0GoogleGoogleTVtvyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeGoogleTV 4.0.4LGGoogle TVcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.77WebKit 534.24Google TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Google TV LGG2 seriestelevisioncloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 GoogleTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:38 | by ThaDafinser