User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2;es-es;GT-I5500 Build/ FROYO) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Geccko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake AndroidBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake AndroidBot/Crawler0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungGT-I5500smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-I5500closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2SamsungGalaxy 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2SamsungGT-i5500Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:37 | by ThaDafinser