User agent detail

MobilePlugin (Microsoft Windows CE 7.10.8862 ; Lumia 900 112.1914.2.0 2175.2905.8853.12440 NOKIA)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaLumia 900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MobilePlugin closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows CE 7.10.8862mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows CE NokiaLumia 900smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows CE NokiaLumia 900closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Windows NokiaLumia 900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows CE 7.10mobile:featureyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.114 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:37 | by ThaDafinser