User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; KFASWI Build/LMY47O) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/41.51020.2250.0238 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Amazon WebView FireOS 5Blink 537.36AmazonFire HD 7tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.51020Blink Android 5.1AmazonFire HD 7tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.51020.2250closeAndroid 5.1.1KFASWIcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.22902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.51020.2250.238WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.58306 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Blink FireOS 5AmazonFire HD 7tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.51020.2250.0238closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 41closeAndroid 5.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:36 | by ThaDafinser