User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.6 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (AS00DTV;V;0001;0001)AQUOS-AS/2.0 LC-60LX850H
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Espial TV Browser 6.1.6 WebKit 531.2SharpLC-60LX850Htv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial 6.1.6close media-playercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpLC-60LX850Htv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.6close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.69637 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.1.6Webkit 531.2 SharpLX850H Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:35 | by ThaDafinser