User agent detail

Flint/173 CFNetwork/673.0.3 Darwin/13.0.0 (x86_64) (MacBookAir4%2C2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Flint 173closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.9desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 673.0.3closeMac OS X 10.9.0AppleMacBookAir4,2closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:35 | by ThaDafinser