User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; X909 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847.114Android 4.2.2Blink OPPOFind 5smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2OPPOX909mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.2OPPOFind 5smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2OppoX909closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.63006 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.2.2OppoFind 5 X909mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 34closeAndroid 4.2OPPOX909Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:34 | by ThaDafinser