User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; En-US; NOVO7 Tornados Build/ICS.f06ref848L.20120619) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, Like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AinolNOVO7 Tornados Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.0AinolNovo 7 Tornadostabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.0.3AinolNOVO7 Tornadoscloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.3AinovoNovo7 Tornadostabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:33 | by ThaDafinser