User agent detail

Mastone_G9_TD/V2.00 Release/3.19.2012 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Android 4.0Android 2.3unknown 533.1MastoneG9Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3MastoneG9Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid MastoneG9mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3yes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5MastoneG9mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3MastoneG9Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:33 | by ThaDafinser