User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-T580 AppleWebkit/531 Browser/Phantom/V2.0 Widget/LGMW/3.0 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGT580 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Phantom Browser 2.0WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Phantom 2.0close LGT580mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java LGT580smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Phantom Browser 2.0close LGT580closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.13301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 531 LGLGT580closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Phantom 2.0Webkit 531 LGT580mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGT580Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:33 | by ThaDafinser